<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>hooverdust.com &#187; 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hooverdust.com/tag/2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hooverdust.com</link>
	<description>Pop-culture, photography, film, music, design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 12:31:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Triple J&#8217;s Hottest 100 of All-Time</title>
		<link>http://www.hooverdust.com/2009/07/12/triple-js-hottest-100-of-all-time-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hooverdust.com/2009/07/12/triple-js-hottest-100-of-all-time-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 09:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hottest 100 of all time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jjj]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Triple J]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hooverdust.com/?p=1499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After live tweeting pretty much the entire list, in the end there was sooooooo much 90&#8242;s love in Triple J&#8217;s Hottest 100 of All-Time 2009 edition. Could it be the best decade for influential music of generations X, Y and Z? Not a bad list overall. Two Jeff Buckley songs in the top 10 was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.abc.net.au/triplej/hottest100_alltime/countdown/cd_list.htm"><img src="http://hooverdust.com/wp-content/images/jjj_hottest100_alltime_09.jpg" width="500" height="124" alt="JJJ Hottest 100 of All-Time 2009 Edition" title="JJJ Hottest 100 of All-Time 2009 Edition" /></a><br />
After <a href="http://twitter.com/hooverdust">live tweeting</a> pretty much the entire list, in the end there was sooooooo much 90&#8242;s love in <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/triplej/hottest100_alltime/countdown/cd_list.htm">Triple J&#8217;s Hottest 100 of All-Time 2009 edition</a>. Could it be the best decade for influential music of generations X, Y and Z? Not a bad list overall. Two Jeff Buckley songs in the top 10 was nice to see. Would have thought &#8216;Joy Division &#8211; Love Will Tear Us Apart&#8217; would have been number 2 at least. Read the Top 10 below:</p>
<ol>
<li>Nirvana &#8211; Smells Like Teen Spirit</li>
<li>Rage Against the Machine &#8211; Killing In The Name</li>
<li>Jeff Buckley &#8211; Hallelujah</li>
<li>Joy Division &#8211; Love Will Tear Us Apart</li>
<li>Radiohead &#8211; Paranoid Android</li>
<li>Queen &#8211; Bohemian Rhapsody</li>
<li>Jeff Buckley &#8211; Last Goodbye</li>
<li>Red Hot Chili Peppers &#8211; Under The Bridge </li>
<li>Foo Fighters &#8211; Everlong</li>
<li>Led Zeppelin &#8211; Stairway to Heaven</li>
</ol>
<p>And <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/triplej/hottest100_alltime/countdown/cd_list.htm">the rest of the list here</a>. Glad to see four Radiohead tracks making the list too. </p>
<p><strong>Biggest surprises?</strong></p>
<p>No U2 (thank fuck!) and maybe one female artist? No love for Kate Bush, PJ Harvey, Bjork???  Weird that silverchair&#8217;s first breakthrough single &#8216;Tomorrow&#8217; made the list and none of their other tracks.  The Killers &#8216;Mr Brightside&#8217; at #38? Total surprise. Overall though, no real surprises for #1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hooverdust.com/2009/07/12/triple-js-hottest-100-of-all-time-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oscars Post-Mortem</title>
		<link>http://www.hooverdust.com/2009/02/24/oscars-post-mortem/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hooverdust.com/2009/02/24/oscars-post-mortem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 06:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hugh Jackman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slumdog Millionaire]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hooverdust.com/?p=1311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wayne posted his thoughts on the Oscars and since I wasn&#8217;t live blogging or Twittering it like some, I thought I&#8217;d still throw in my two cents post-mortem. I didn&#8217;t do my obligatory Oscar predictions here on the blog but on my Twitter page. I got most of them right (I think!) except for best [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://hooverdust.com/wp-content/images/oscars2009.jpg" width="500" height="672" alt="Beyonce &#038; Hugh - Oscars 2009" title="Beyonce &#038; Hugh - Oscars 2009" /><br />
<a href="http://oceansneverlisten.blogspot.com/2009/02/thoughts-on-oscars.html">Wayne</a> posted his thoughts on the Oscars and since I wasn&#8217;t live blogging or Twittering it like some, I thought I&#8217;d still throw in my two cents post-mortem.  I didn&#8217;t do my obligatory Oscar predictions here on the blog but on my <a href="http://twitter.com/hooverdust">Twitter page</a>. I got most of them right (I think!) except for best supporting actress and best actor. Here we go:</p>
<ul>
<li>Was it just me or did the sets look reeeeeeeeeeeeeally cheap this year? I understand WHY they presented it that way but it took a lot of the glamour out of the event. Call me old fashioned. Many people praised the look though.</li>
<li>Look Hugh Jackman was neither here nor there for me. I freakin HATE musicals so that probably had something to do with it. He was respectful, calm and collected but totally uninteresting too.</li>
<li>Didn&#8217;t Brad and Angelina look like they were above it all? (but in a graceful way?)</li>
<li>Kate Winslet NEARLY went into cringe worthy territory for her acceptance speech but is too classy to really get there. Penelope Cruz got there though.</li>
<li>Tina Fey continues to rock.</li>
<li>Seth Rogen and James Franco&#8217;s segment. Pretty funny.</li>
<li>Most awkward moment: Jennifer Aniston presenting in front of Brangelina. Ouch!</li>
<li>Heather Ledger&#8217;s family accepting his award. All class.</li>
<li>Didn&#8217;t know Queen Latifah had a decent voice.</li>
<li>Beyonce always looks good even if the performance isn&#8217;t.</li>
<li>Danny Boyle jumping around and accepting his award for his kids. Great moment</li>
<li>Sean Penn giving a fantastic speech</li>
<li>I said to my wife &#8220;Sophia Loren still looks great!&#8221;. But then I double-taked when she presented. Whoooahh!</li>
<li>Seeing the cast and crew of <em>Slumdog Millionaire</em> being so happy on stage.</li>
<li>Jury&#8217;s still out on Anne Hathaway. She&#8217;s great in <em>Rachel Getting Married</em> (review coming soon) but could end up with an Oscar one day and a tragic acceptance speech to follow</li>
<li>Even Jack (Nicholson) didn&#8217;t show up this year! He&#8217;s ALWAYS there! (unless I didn&#8217;t see him).</li>
<li>The 10 second preview of 2009 movies at the end of the ceremony was ultimately a zzzzzzzzzz although <a href="http://us.imdb.com/title/tt1152836/">Public Enemies</a> is shaping up to be all kinds of awesome.</li>
<li>Jackman sitting on Frank Langella&#8217;s lap and laying one on him seemed rather uncomfortable for all.</li>
<li><em>Wall-E</em> was a shoe-in for Best Animated Film but it is easily one of the best FILMS of 2008.</li>
<li>Overall, I think they should get rid of a host for the Oscar&#8217;s entirely OR get Letterman back (j/king). They&#8217;re not needed really, especially after the whole thing looks cheaper than ever.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hooverdust.com/2009/02/24/oscars-post-mortem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>12 Big Movies of 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.hooverdust.com/2009/01/02/12-big-movies-of-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hooverdust.com/2009/01/02/12-big-movies-of-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 01:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Enemies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Where the Wild Things Are]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Year One]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hooverdust.com/?p=1205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Public Enemies for sure (Michael Mann directs Johnny Depp and Christian Bale? Whoahh!), Where the Wild Things Are, The Year One. But they left out Avatar, This Side of the Truth, A Serious Man, The Brothers Bloom, Shutter Island, etc&#8230; Via EW.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://us.imdb.com/title/tt1152836/">Public Enemies</a> for sure (Michael Mann directs Johnny Depp and Christian Bale? Whoahh!), <a href="http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0386117/">Where the Wild Things Are</a>, <a href="http://us.imdb.com/title/tt1045778/">The Year One</a>. But they left out <a href="http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0499549/">Avatar</a>, <a href="http://us.imdb.com/title/tt1105299/">This Side of the Truth</a>, <a href="http://us.imdb.com/title/tt1019452/">A Serious Man</a>, <a href="http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0844286/">The Brothers Bloom</a>, <a href="http://us.imdb.com/title/tt1130884/">Shutter Island</a>, etc&#8230;  Via <a href="http://www.ew.com/ew/gallery/0,,20249045,00.html">EW</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hooverdust.com/2009/01/02/12-big-movies-of-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
