<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>hooverdust.com &#187; Film Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hooverdust.com/tag/film-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hooverdust.com</link>
	<description>Pop-culture, photography, film, music, design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 12:31:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Short Reviews #46</title>
		<link>http://www.hooverdust.com/2009/12/10/short-reviews-46/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=short-reviews-46</link>
		<comments>http://www.hooverdust.com/2009/12/10/short-reviews-46/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 13:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer's Body]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Final Destination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twilight: New Moon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hooverdust.com/?p=1845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Moon (2009) I have so much praise for this sci-fi flick, I can hardly contain my excitement. Whether it be the excellent performance from Sam Rockwell, the visuals, the set design, the direction, the score and an overwhelming sense of abandonment and loneliness you feel in every frame make this easily one of the year&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://us.imdb.com/title/tt1182345/"><img src="http://www.hooverdust.com/wp-content/images/sr46.jpg" width="500" height="340" alt="Short Reviews #46" title="Short Reviews #46" /></a><br />
<a href="http://us.imdb.com/title/tt1182345/">Moon</a> (2009)<br />
<img class="filmrating" src="/wp-content/images/star_one.gif" alt="star" /><img class="filmrating" src="/wp-content/images/star_one.gif" alt="star" /><img class="filmrating" src="/wp-content/images/star_one.gif " alt="star" /><img class="filmrating" src="/wp-content/images/star_half.gif" alt="star _half" /></p>
<p>I have so much praise for this sci-fi flick, I can hardly contain my excitement. Whether it be the excellent performance from Sam Rockwell, the visuals, the set design, the direction, the score and an overwhelming sense of abandonment and loneliness you feel in every frame make this easily one of the year&#8217;s best films. The simple premise finds Sam Rockwell positioned on the moon, along with GERTY, a computer (similar to HAL from <em>2001</em>) to send back to Earth parcels of a resource that has helped diminish our planet&#8217;s power problems. He&#8217;s been there three years and strange things start to happen.  Directed by Duncan Jones (who is actually David Bowie&#8217;s son!), <em>Moon</em> is an ambitious film yet shot on extremely low-budget (around US$5 million). However it looks more expensive than it is and Jones throws around grand thematic content that any serious sci-fi film fan will embrace with open arms. Clearly inspired by <em>2001</em> both visually and in tone, the themes are different for the most part however and it will stay with you long after the credits roll, much like <em>2001</em>. Although <em>Star Trek</em> made all the money this year at the sci-fi box-office, <em>Moon</em> is certainly the more fascinating of the two.</p>
<p><span id="more-1845"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0844471/">Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs</a> (3D) (2009)<br />
<img class="filmrating" src="/wp-content/images/star_one.gif" alt="star" /><img class="filmrating" src="/wp-content/images/star_one.gif" alt="star" /><img class="filmrating" src="/wp-content/images/star_one.gif" alt="star " /><img class="filmrating" src="/wp-content/images/star_empty.gif" alt="star_empty" /></p>
<p>Although this year&#8217;s best animated film is most definitely <em>UP</em>, <em> Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs</em> comes in second.  This is a hilarious, 3D family film with a strong sense of originality and a well chosen voice cast. SNL&#8217;s Bill Hader plays the lead Flint Lockwood, a local scientist who accidently discovers how to make it rain food. Anna Faris provides the voice of Sam Sparks, a local female reporter and love interest for Flint. Other strong voice cast members include Andy Samberg, James Caan, Mr T and Bill Campbell. <em>Cloudy</em> is based upon the 1978 children&#8217;s book of the same name and from all reports it&#8217;s quite faithful. Although it&#8217;s stylised for 3D, some of the shots are very close to the original illustrations from Ron Barrett and this will keep fans happy whilst intriguing newcomers.  </p>
<p><a href="http://us.imdb.com/title/tt1259571/">Twilight: New Moon</a> (2009)<br />
<img class="filmrating" src="/wp-content/images/star_one.gif" alt="star" /><img class="filmrating" src="/wp-content/images/star_one.gif" alt="star " /><img class="filmrating" src="/wp-content/images/star_empty.gif" alt="star _empty" /><img class="filmrating" src="/wp-content/images/star_empty.gif" alt="star _empty" /></p>
<p>Right well how do I explain this one? Let&#8217;s see – I saw the original not too long ago on blu-ray and felt awkward throughout the entire film due to the stilted performances. But then this sequel made an absolute shit ton of money at the US box office and I wondered &#8220;Could they have improved the formula?&#8221;. The answer? Heeeeeeeeeeeeeellll no! This is still another awkward instalment in a series of films based upon the Stephanie Meyer books. This time one of the teens juices up on the roids and runs around shirtless for nearly the entire movie – it&#8217;s essentially porn for schoolgirls, a trashy teenage novel come to life.  But in all fairness, the filmmakers know EXACTLY how to appeal to this target audience and if those box office numbers are anything to go by, then they must be doing a pretty good job. If we leave the entire concept of solid filmmaking out of the equation, then this is perfect teenage girl fodder. Under the terrible performances, pathetic script and actually decent soundtrack, I can start to see why these films have done so well. Yes I hated the film generally but I still admire what Chris Weitz has done for the most part – making the fans happy. </p>
<p><a href="http://us.imdb.com/title/tt1131734/">Jennifer&#8217;s Body</a> (2009)<br />
<img class="filmrating" src="/wp-content/images/star_one.gif" alt="star" /><img class="filmrating" src="/wp-content/images/star_one.gif" alt="star " /><img class="filmrating" src="/wp-content/images/star_empty.gif" alt="star_empty " /><img class="filmrating" src="/wp-content/images/star_empty.gif" alt="star _empty" /></p>
<p>One minute you&#8217;re hot property, and the next you&#8217;re making B-grade horror. Welcome to Hollywood Diablo Cody! Actually, that&#8217;s not true. People love to rag on Cody but you just have to watch <em>The United States of Tara</em> (and of course <em>Juno</em>) to know the woman can write dialogue. Sure it dates fairly quickly but there&#8217;s a charm to it. Unfortunately with <em>Jennifer&#8217;s Body</em>, Cody seems to be channeling some 80&#8242;s <em>Heathers </em> vibe yet it doesn&#8217;t come across overly successful. The third act stumbles a great deal. I actually think Megan Fox is perfect in the role – it&#8217;s not a stretch and works with her errrr assets but ultimately the film offers nothing fresh and slides into mediocrity fairly quickly.  The trailers looked fun and I had high expectations for this one, but the film even by-passed an Australian cinema release and is nowhere to be found on DVD here. That can’t be good.</p>
<p><a href="http://us.imdb.com/title/tt1144884/">The Final Destination</a> (3D) (2009)<br />
<img class="filmrating" src="/wp-content/images/star_one.gif" alt="star" /><img class="filmrating" src="/wp-content/images/star_empty.gif" alt="star_empty" /><img class="filmrating" src="/wp-content/images/star_empty.gif" alt="star _empty" /><img class="filmrating" src="/wp-content/images/star_empty.gif" alt="star_empty" /></p>
<p>They don&#8217;t get much more C grade than <em>The Final Destination</em>.  I actually enjoyed the first two films somewhat and director David R. Ellis did a decent job with <em>Final Destination 2</em>.  The stuntman/director has a twisted sense of humor that occasionally works (<em>Snakes on a Plane</em> wasn&#8217;t one of them) but I don’t think he even read the script this time around (was there even one?). No, he clearly decided &#8220;What&#8217;s the most violent way I can kill this person using bad CGI in 3D?&#8221; and took a big fat paycheck for his work.  The 3D effects are terrible though, and how this made over US$60 million at the box office is a total shock although never underestimate the power of franchise. Anyway, I&#8217;ve said too much about this pile of craphola. Review out. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hooverdust.com/2009/12/10/short-reviews-46/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Short Reviews #45</title>
		<link>http://www.hooverdust.com/2009/11/16/short-reviews-45/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=short-reviews-45</link>
		<comments>http://www.hooverdust.com/2009/11/16/short-reviews-45/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 10:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A Christmas Carol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bored to Death]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Funny People]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paranormal Activity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hooverdust.com/?p=1822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2012 (2009) DESTROPORN! Yes Roland Emmerich delivers yet another disaster movie with special effects up the yin-yang and paltry character arcs. But if you expect more from the German filmmaker, you will be disappointed. This is perhaps his finest film in terms of f/x work and watching the world crumble on a huge screen is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://us.imdb.com/title/tt1190080/"><img src="http://www.hooverdust.com/wp-content/images/sr45.jpg" width="500" height="340" alt="2012" title="2012" /></a><br />
<a href="http://us.imdb.com/title/tt1190080/">2012</a> (2009)<br />
<img class="filmrating" src="/wp-content/images/star_one.gif" alt="star" /><img class="filmrating" src="/wp-content/images/star_one.gif" alt="star" /><img class="filmrating" src="/wp-content/images/star_one.gif" alt="star " /><img class="filmrating" src="/wp-content/images/star_empty.gif" alt="star_empty" /></p>
<p>DESTROPORN! Yes Roland Emmerich delivers yet another disaster movie with special effects up the yin-yang and paltry character arcs. But if you expect more from the German filmmaker, you will be disappointed. This is perhaps his finest film in terms of f/x work and watching the world crumble on a huge screen is worth the price of admission alone. The sequence where John Cusack and co flee the destruction in a limo is so outrageously unbelievable yet undeniably thrilling, it makes for great popcorn fun. The same applies when they ditch the limo for the small plane. Of course, character drama is scattered throughout and it&#8217;s awfully grating at times that you wish someone would throw Emmerich down a molten volcano cavity, but he makes up for it with ultra destruction. Sadly the best sequences are in the trailer and I was expecting perhaps a little more that they just didn&#8217;t show but with a reported US$260 million budget, I guess money has to run out somewhere. Emmerich is now apparently eyeing off <em>Independence Day</em> sequels. Yeeeeeeeep.</p>
<p><a href="http://us.imdb.com/title/tt1179904/">Paranormal Activity</a> (2007)<br />
<img class="filmrating" src="/wp-content/images/star_one.gif" alt="star" /><img class="filmrating" src="/wp-content/images/star_one.gif" alt="star" /><img class="filmrating" src="/wp-content/images/star_one.gif " alt="star" /><img class="filmrating" src="/wp-content/images/star_half.gif" alt="star _half" /></p>
<p><em>Paranormal Activity</em> sat on the shelves for a while, filmmaker Oren Peli then starting playing it at festivals and eventually Spielberg got hold of it, told Peli to change the ending and the rest is now cinematic history. Costing US$15,000 to make and breaking the US$100 million box office draw, the film is easily one of the year&#8217;s best horror/thrillers and if you bought into the whole <em>Blair Witch Project</em>, chances are you will be scared out of your mind with <em>Paranormal Activity</em>. The film focuses a couple living in a house that are haunted daily by a demon in the early hours of the morning and decide to film the events on digital video over a series of October nights. Such a simple premise, director Peli starts with a slow build and eventually revves it up for a terrifying conclusion. He uses the exact same scare technique as all the best horror films – the fear of the unknown. Horror fans who like their films oozing with gore will be disappointed but rest assured, if you watch this sucker just before bed with an audience of people who buy into the whole premise, good luck trying to get to sleep! PS – There are apparently three endings to the film, I&#8217;ve seen two and much prefer the original, non-theatrical ending. You can read or see them online (Google is your friend).</p>
<p><a href="http://us.imdb.com/title/tt1067106/">A Christmas Carol</a> (2009)<br />
<img class="filmrating" src="/wp-content/images/star_one.gif" alt="star" /><img class="filmrating" src="/wp-content/images/star_one.gif" alt="star " /><img class="filmrating" src="/wp-content/images/star_one.gif" alt="star " /><img class="filmrating" src="/wp-content/images/star_empty.gif" alt="star _empty" /></p>
<p>This latest update of the classic Dicken&#8217;s story is certainly one to test purists and cinema goers alike. For one, Zemeckis sticks largely to the original source material with characters spouting word-from-word from the text.  Secondly, he continues to utilise his performance-capture techniques to realize the characters and world in which the story takes place.  I remember reading quite a backlash against the film initially with people saying why doesn&#8217;t he just shoot everything live action but once you see the film, you realise it&#8217;s far more seamless doing it with performance-capture, 3D and CGI. That&#8217;s not to say it&#8217;s perfect by any means but Zemeckis is such a master of cinema and 3D performance capture, he knows how to tell a story that is ultimately cinematic and will appeal to all audiences.  Of course, if you actively despise performance capture, then this probably won&#8217;t appeal to you at all.  Jim Carrey plays a number of characters in the film and his performance is one of his best in years, even under the performance-capture mask. Silvestri&#8217;s score is also a highlight, with plenty of Christmas carol&#8217;s beautifully rendered. The film is actually very dark thematically in places (much like the book) and this is probably too dark for the very young, but teens and above should enjoy what&#8217;s on offer here and seeing it in 3D at a cinema is a must. But yeah, we still want another live-action <em>Back to the Future</em> trilogy thanks Zemeckis!</p>
<p><a href="http://us.imdb.com/title/tt1201167/">Funny People</a> (2009)<br />
<img class="filmrating" src="/wp-content/images/star_one.gif" alt="star" /><img class="filmrating" src="/wp-content/images/star_one.gif" alt="star " /><img class="filmrating" src="/wp-content/images/star_half.gif" alt="star_half " /><img class="filmrating" src="/wp-content/images/star_empty.gif" alt="star _empty" /></p>
<p>Judd Apatow&#8217;s attempt at a Cameron Crowe film? At least in the first half. Then it loses steam and at just over two and a half hours, it does seem to go on, and on, and on, and on…. It&#8217;s almost as if because of the success of <em>40 Year Old Virgin</em>and <em>Knocked Up</em>, executives have given him free reign with anything he does. However someone should have informed him &#8220;You really need to cut out forty-five minutes to an hour of this second half&#8221;. Had he listened, this would have been a much tighter, less conflicted film because all the elements are there – the characters, the laughs, even some drama. But it outstays its welcome in that last half and I really wanted it to end to be honest.  Rogan (who lost a fair bit of weight since <em>Observe &#038; Report</em>) was actually likeable this time around, with solid support from his room-mates Jonah Hill and Jason Schwartzman. But this is Adam Sandler&#8217;s film and he does very well in the role. We all know Sandler showed dramatic promise with <em>Punch Drunk-Love</em> and whilst this role won&#8217;t win him an Oscar, it does paint him in a different light – especially since the character he is playing is a representation of himself in some way, albeit a more obnoxious and self-centred version.  There is much to like here but the film is such a jumbled mess, it&#8217;s hard to recommend it.</p>
<p><a href="http://us.imdb.com/title/tt1255913/">Bored to Death</a> (TV) (2009)<br />
<img class="filmrating" src="/wp-content/images/star_one.gif" alt="star" /><img class="filmrating" src="/wp-content/images/star_one.gif" alt="star" /><img class="filmrating" src="/wp-content/images/star_one.gif" alt="star " /><img class="filmrating" src="/wp-content/images/star_empty.gif" alt="star_empty" /></p>
<p>Jonathan Ame&#8217;s HBO mystery noir comedy is a fun show, with Jason Schwartzman playing a struggling New York writer/unlicensed private detective who just broke up with his girlfriend, his friend and occasional sidekick played by Zack Galifianakis and Ted Danson, who plays Schwartzman&#8217;s magazine editor friend.  The entire ensemble is fantastic and although I&#8217;ve never been a big Danson fan before, he surprises here. The show doesn&#8217;t really have a definitive arc and meanders from episode-to-episode but there are some truly comedic gold moments scattered throughout the eight episode first season.  Schwartzman was born to play the lead (he also performs the theme song) while Galifianakis continues to play awkward yet hilarious characters.  I prefer this to HBO&#8217;s other drifting comedy &#8216;Hung&#8217; only because it&#8217;s much funnier but I just wish the next season knows where it&#8217;s going from beginning to end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hooverdust.com/2009/11/16/short-reviews-45/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Short Reviews #44</title>
		<link>http://www.hooverdust.com/2009/11/03/short-reviews-44/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=short-reviews-44</link>
		<comments>http://www.hooverdust.com/2009/11/03/short-reviews-44/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 06:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Halloween]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Name is Bruce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orphan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trick 'r Treat]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hooverdust.com/?p=1811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Trick &#8216;r Treat (2008) Trick &#8216;r Treat sat on the shelf for over a year but we can finally now see Michael Dougherty&#8217;s feature film debut exercise in Halloween fun. It&#8217;s a shame this never made it to cinemas because this would be great fun to watch with a huge audience of horror fans. The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0862856/"><img src="http://www.hooverdust.com/wp-content/images/sr44.jpg" width="500" height="340" alt="Short Reviews #44" title="Short Reviews #44" /></a><br />
<a href="http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0862856/">Trick &#8216;r Treat</a> (2008)<br />
<img class="filmrating" src="/wp-content/images/star_one.gif" alt="star" /><img class="filmrating" src="/wp-content/images/star_one.gif" alt="star " /><img class="filmrating" src="/wp-content/images/star_one.gif" alt="star " /><img class="filmrating" src="/wp-content/images/star_half.gif" alt="star _half" /></p>
<p><em>Trick &#8216;r Treat</em> sat on the shelf for over a year but we can finally now see Michael Dougherty&#8217;s feature film debut exercise in Halloween fun. It&#8217;s a shame this never made it to cinemas because this would be great fun to watch with a huge audience of horror fans.  The film interweaves four separate stories much like in the tradition of the <em>Tales of the Crypt</em> 80&#8242;s series and all of the sequences work really well. The school bus sequence is a highlight and genuinely scary but the film takes on his black humour tone which is hard to resist for any horror fan. I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve seen a more polished Halloween film since the original <em>Halloween</em> (reviewed below) that captures the spirit of the American holiday.  Whilst this isn&#8217;t in the same league of seminal horror greats, I look forward to popping this in the blu-ray player each and every Halloween. Dougherty at one point wanted to make one of these films every Halloween but I doubt that will ever eventuate. If I had to knit pick, the only downside was in the last sequence when the sack kid (Sam) removed his head sack. Better to keep it a mystery.</p>
<p><a href="http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0417741/">Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince</a> (2009)<br />
<img class="filmrating" src="/wp-content/images/star_one.gif" alt="star" /><img class="filmrating" src="/wp-content/images/star_one.gif" alt="star " /><img class="filmrating" src="/wp-content/images/star_one.gif" alt="star " /><img class="filmrating" src="/wp-content/images/star_empty.gif" alt="star _empty" /></p>
<p>The latest Harry Potter largely differs in tone to the previous films in the franchise. Whereas the others had various degrees of lightness and darkness, <em>The Half-Blood Prince</em> goes to the darkness and relies on dialogue and mood rather than the spectacle we are so used to with the other films.  And that&#8217;s fine IF the performances can deliver. Unfortunately the three leads are still fairly average when it comes to delivering an emotional performance. I guess you could blame the actors in some way but I think it also comes down to direction. There is a major death in this film but for some reason, I didn&#8217;t emote like I should have. I&#8217;ve enjoyed most of the previous films in the franchise but I found this one very cold and quite frankly, boring albeit well-made technically. From my understanding this is the beginning of a major war in the stories timeline so I guess this is a setup film but at the same time, it&#8217;s two and half hours long and it feels ultimately uneventful and unsatisfying. Here&#8217;s hoping director David Yates can deliver the goods and reach (and hopefully go beyond) some of the cinematic heights of Afonso&#8217;s efforts in <em>The Prisoner of Azkaban</em> (the best film in the franchise imho) for the final two films.</p>
<p><a href="http://us.imdb.com/title/tt1148204/">Orphan</a> (2009)<br />
<img class="filmrating" src="/wp-content/images/star_one.gif" alt="star" /><img class="filmrating" src="/wp-content/images/star_one.gif" alt="star" /><img class="filmrating" src="/wp-content/images/star_one.gif" alt="star " /><img class="filmrating" src="/wp-content/images/star_empty.gif" alt="star_empty" /></p>
<p> The psycho killer child. We&#8217;ve all seen at least one example in the genre but this one is actually rather effective. The performance from youngster Isabelle Fuhrman is both exceptional and incredibly freaky at times. This is certainly not one you would watch with kids either as quite violent at times but it&#8217;s also well directed and the performances for the most part are very good. The ending gets a little silly but if you get that far, you go with it regardless. Genre fans will lap this one up, everyone else will want to avoid. </p>
<p><a href="http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0077651/">Halloween</a> (1978)<br />
<img class="filmrating" src="/wp-content/images/star_one.gif" alt="star" /><img class="filmrating" src="/wp-content/images/star_one.gif" alt="star" /><img class="filmrating" src="/wp-content/images/star_one.gif " alt="star" /><img class="filmrating" src="/wp-content/images/star_one.gif" alt="star " /></p>
<p>The original and still the best, I screened this at our Halloween party this year on blu-ray and it simply looks stunning! Sure it&#8217;s aged a bit but the mastery is all there – the music, the cinematography, the way Michael moves, the heavy breathing, the terrible acting (which I think adds to the mood), the building of suspense. It&#8217;s definitely on equal footing with Hitchcock&#8217;s <em>Psycho</em> (obviously where it gets its inspiration from) and oh my god, shits all over Rob Zombie&#8217;s pathetic reimagining. I&#8217;m still a little confused as to why it still carries an R rating here in Australia when there&#8217;s hardly any blood at all! I haven&#8217;t checked out the audio commentary from Carpenter, Jamie Lee Curtis and Debra Hill. Can&#8217;t wait!</p>
<p><a href="http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0489235/">My Name is Bruce</a> (2007)<br />
<img class="filmrating" src="/wp-content/images/star_one.gif" alt="star" /><img class="filmrating" src="/wp-content/images/star_one.gif" alt="star" /><img class="filmrating" src="/wp-content/images/star_empty.gif" alt="star_empty " /><img class="filmrating" src="/wp-content/images/star_empty.gif" alt="star_empty" /></p>
<p>Serious <em>Evil Dead</em> and Bruce Campbell fans will probably get a kick out of this b-grade comedy where Campbell plays himself.  I love the <em>Evil Dead</em> films and of course Bruce but this is very by-the-numbers material. Campbell plays himself who is kidnapped by a fan to help hunt a monster in a small town in Oregon.  Campbell directed this one and there are plenty of <em>Evil Dead</em> cameos and references. The trouble is, you kinda want to see another <em>Evil Dead</em> film rather than this because it&#8217;s pretty terrible.  It just goes to show what talent Sam Raimi has because he knows how to use Bruce well in a movie. Oh well, I guess we&#8217;ll have to wait until Sam decides to direct another <em>Evil Dead</em>. *Sigh*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hooverdust.com/2009/11/03/short-reviews-44/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

